LU v European Investment Bank
Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 January 2025
Open official document (opens in a new tab)About this page & coverageIndividual case
- What you’ll find
- The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
- Coverage and limits
- The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.
Official source
Civil service – EIB staff – Complaint of psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Final report of the investigation panel – Manifest inadmissibility – Decision confirming the findings of the investigation report and recommending the reopening of disciplinary proceedings for malicious complaint – Withdrawal of the contested measure – No need to adjudicate.
Full official title
Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 January 2025.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Complaint of psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Final report of the investigation panel – Manifest inadmissibility – Decision confirming the findings of the investigation report and recommending the reopening of disciplinary proceedings for malicious complaint – Withdrawal of the contested measure – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-160/24.
- EUR-Lex document 62024TO0160(opens in a new tab)Text retrieved 11 October 2026
AI summary
Not generatedGenerated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.
No summary has been generated for this case yet.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription
Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.
The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.