Selected official records
A hand-curated selection of recent official records relevant to staff safeguards and oversight. Each entry links to its publishing authority.
About this page & coverageEditorial selection
- What you’ll find
- A hand-curated selection of official court judgments, Ombudsman decisions and Commission reports on OLAF, each retaining its official title and source link; summaries are this site’s editorial descriptions.
- Coverage and limits
- This is an editorial selection, not a comprehensive daily feed. Records can overlap the Court rulings or Rules & updates collections and are ordered newest first when a date is available.
Decisions and reports
Editorial selection
Checked on . These entries are separate from the daily feeds and are not presented as automatic search results.
European Ombudsman decision
Decision on the European Commission’s refusal to give public access to documents concerning the follow-up to an OLAF investigation (case 132/2025/ACB) (opens the official source in a new tab)
This decision concerns transparency and document access after an OLAF investigation, including how follow-up can be scrutinised. It is contextual to disciplinary transparency and staff safeguards, not a finding of harassment.
Case 132/2025/ACBEuropean Ombudsman
Commission report
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the evaluation of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (opens the official source in a new tab)
The OLAF evaluation discusses inconsistent interpretations of OLAF powers in matters involving EU staff, including harassment, and identifies questions around whistleblower and informant safeguards. It is an oversight report, not a determination of an individual harassment complaint.
CELEX 52026DC0493EUR-Lex
General Court judgment
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 March 2026. QI v European Commission. Case T-6/25. (opens the official source in a new tab)
A General Court staff case about alleged psychological harassment, a request for assistance under Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations, and liability. The action was dismissed; the judgment is the authority for the court’s reasons and outcome.
CELEX 62025TJ0006EUR-Lex
Court of Justice judgment
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026. XH v European Commission. Case C-75/24 P. (opens the official source in a new tab)
An appeal in a civil-service case involving allegations of psychological harassment during sick leave, a rejected request for assistance and compensation, and an invalidity procedure. The judgment addresses admissibility and the General Court’s reasoning; it is a ruling on this case, not a general Commission policy.
CELEX 62024CJ0075EUR-Lex