QI v European Commission
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 December 2023
Open official document (opens in a new tab)About this page & coverageIndividual case
- What you’ll find
- The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
- Coverage and limits
- The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.
Official source
Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Refusal of request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Prima facie evidence – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Liability.
Full official title
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 December 2023.#QI v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Refusal of request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Prima facie evidence – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-807/21.
- EUR-Lex document 62021TJ0807(opens in a new tab)Text not retrieved. Only the link and metadata are available.
AI summary
Not generatedGenerated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.
No summary has been generated for this case yet.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription
Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.
The prompt includes this record and its source links. Add the full judgment in your AI app before asking for analysis.