Menu

T-17/19General Court of the European UnionJudgment of

Giulia Moi v European Parliament

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 February 2021

Open official document (opens in a new tab)
About this page & coverageIndividual case
What you’ll find
The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
Coverage and limits
The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.

Official source

Institutional law – European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that two accredited parliamentary assistants suffered harassment and imposing on a Member of Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 12 days – Rules 11 and 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Internal appeal – Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament confirming the penalty – Rule 167 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Rights of the defence – Non-contractual liability.

Full official title

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 February 2021.#Giulia Moi v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that two accredited parliamentary assistants suffered harassment and imposing on a Member of Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of 12 days – Rules 11 and 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Internal appeal – Decision of the Bureau of the Parliament confirming the penalty – Rule 167 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Admissibility – Rights of the defence – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-17/19.

AI summary

Not generated

Generated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.

No summary has been generated for this case yet.

Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription

Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.

The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.