Menu

C-14/19 PCourt of Justice of the European UnionJudgment of

European Union Satellite Centre v KF

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020

Open official document (opens in a new tab)
About this page & coverageIndividual case
What you’ll find
The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
Coverage and limits
The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.

Official source

Subject matter

  • Appeal
  • Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen)
  • Member of SatCen’s contract staff
  • Complaints of psychological harassment
  • Administrative investigation
  • Request for assistance
  • Suspension of the staff member
  • Disciplinary proceedings
  • Removal of the staff member
  • SatCen’s Appeals Board
  • Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes
  • Action for annulment
  • First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU
  • Action for damages
  • Article 268 TFEU
  • Jurisdiction of the EU judicature
  • Admissibility
  • Acts open to challenge
  • Contractual nature of the dispute
  • Articles 272 and 274 TFEU
  • Effective judicial protection
  • Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU
  • First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU
  • Principle of equal treatment
  • General Court’s obligation to state reasons
  • Distortion of the facts and evidence
  • Rights of the defence
  • Principle of sound administration
Full official title

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#European Union Satellite Centre v KF.#Appeal — Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) — Member of SatCen’s contract staff — Complaints of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Request for assistance — Suspension of the staff member — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal of the staff member — SatCen’s Appeals Board — Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes — Action for annulment — First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU — Action for damages — Article 268 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature — Admissibility — Acts open to challenge — Contractual nature of the dispute — Articles 272 and 274 TFEU — Effective judicial protection — Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU — First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU — Principle of equal treatment — General Court’s obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration.#Case C-14/19 P.

AI summary

Not generated

Generated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.

No summary has been generated for this case yet.

Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription

Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.

The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.