European Union Satellite Centre v KF
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020
Open official document (opens in a new tab)About this page & coverageIndividual case
- What you’ll find
- The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
- Coverage and limits
- The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.
Official source
Subject matter
- Appeal
- Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen)
- Member of SatCen’s contract staff
- Complaints of psychological harassment
- Administrative investigation
- Request for assistance
- Suspension of the staff member
- Disciplinary proceedings
- Removal of the staff member
- SatCen’s Appeals Board
- Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes
- Action for annulment
- First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU
- Action for damages
- Article 268 TFEU
- Jurisdiction of the EU judicature
- Admissibility
- Acts open to challenge
- Contractual nature of the dispute
- Articles 272 and 274 TFEU
- Effective judicial protection
- Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU
- First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU
- Principle of equal treatment
- General Court’s obligation to state reasons
- Distortion of the facts and evidence
- Rights of the defence
- Principle of sound administration
Full official title
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020.#European Union Satellite Centre v KF.#Appeal — Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) — Member of SatCen’s contract staff — Complaints of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Request for assistance — Suspension of the staff member — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal of the staff member — SatCen’s Appeals Board — Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes — Action for annulment — First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU — Action for damages — Article 268 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature — Admissibility — Acts open to challenge — Contractual nature of the dispute — Articles 272 and 274 TFEU — Effective judicial protection — Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU — First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU — Principle of equal treatment — General Court’s obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration.#Case C-14/19 P.
- EUR-Lex document 62019CJ0014(opens in a new tab)Text retrieved 12 October 2026
AI summary
Not generatedGenerated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.
No summary has been generated for this case yet.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription
Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.
The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.