Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 May 2020
Open official document (opens in a new tab)About this page & coverageIndividual case
- What you’ll find
- The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
- Coverage and limits
- The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.
Official source
Civil service – ECB staff – Complaint of discrimination and psychological harassment – Internal administrative inquiry – Rejection of the complaint – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Right to be heard – Request for access to the minutes of the hearings of witnesses – Destruction of the inquiry file – Probative character of the evidence submitted to the Court – Incomplete examination – Psychological harassment – Error of law – Duty to provide assistance – Responsibility – Causal link – Non-material damage.
Full official title
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Complaint of discrimination and psychological harassment – Internal administrative inquiry – Rejection of the complaint – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Right to be heard – Request for access to the minutes of the hearings of witnesses – Destruction of the inquiry file – Probative character of the evidence submitted to the Court – Incomplete examination – Psychological harassment – Error of law – Duty to provide assistance – Responsibility – Causal link – Non-material damage.#Case T-483/16 RENV.
- EUR-Lex document 62016TJ0483(opens in a new tab)Text retrieved 11 October 2026
AI summary
Not generatedGenerated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.
No summary has been generated for this case yet.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription
Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.
The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.