QH v European Parliament
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 May 2019
Open official document (opens in a new tab)About this page & coverageIndividual case
- What you’ll find
- The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
- Coverage and limits
- The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.
Official source
Subject matter
- Civil service
- Members of the temporary staff
- Article 24 of the Staff Regulations
- Request for assistance
- Article 12a of the Staff Regulations
- Psychological harassment
- Decision rejecting the request for assistance
- Principles of objectivity and impartiality
- Right to good administration
- Right to be heard
Full official title
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#QH v European Parliament.#Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Decision rejecting the request for assistance — Principles of objectivity and impartiality — Right to good administration — Right to be heard.#Case T-748/16.
- EUR-Lex document 62016TJ0748(opens in a new tab)Text retrieved 11 October 2026
AI summary
Not generatedGenerated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.
No summary has been generated for this case yet.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription
Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.
The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.