OZ v European Investment Bank
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 April 2019
Open official document (opens in a new tab)About this page & coverageIndividual case
- What you’ll find
- The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
- Coverage and limits
- The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.
Official source
Subject matter
- Appeal
- Civil service
- Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB)
- Sexual harassment
- Investigation carried out in the context of the ‘Dignity at work’ programme
- Rejection of a complaint alleging harassment
- Application for annulment of the decision of the President of the EIB rejecting the complaint
- Compensation for damage
Full official title
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 April 2019.#OZ v European Investment Bank.#Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) — Sexual harassment — Investigation carried out in the context of the ‘Dignity at work’ programme — Rejection of a complaint alleging harassment — Application for annulment of the decision of the President of the EIB rejecting the complaint — Compensation for damage.#Case C-558/17 P.
- EUR-Lex document 62017CJ0558(opens in a new tab)Text retrieved 11 October 2026
AI summary
Not generatedGenerated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.
No summary has been generated for this case yet.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription
Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.
The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.