Menu

T-565/22General Court of the European UnionJudgment of

HF v European Parliament

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 April 2025

Open official document (opens in a new tab)
About this page & coverageIndividual case
What you’ll find
The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
Coverage and limits
The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.

Official source

Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Advisory Committee on Harassment and its Prevention at the Workplace – Impartiality – Principle of good administration – Error of assessment – Liability – Non-material damage.

Full official title

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 April 2025.#HF v European Parliament.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative investigation – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Advisory Committee on Harassment and its Prevention at the Workplace – Impartiality – Principle of good administration – Error of assessment – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-565/22.

AI summary

Not generated

Generated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.

No summary has been generated for this case yet.

Unavailable: no source text has been retrieved for this case.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription

Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.

The prompt includes this record and its source links. Add the full judgment in your AI app before asking for analysis.