CN v European Parliament
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 December 2018
Open official document (opens in a new tab)About this page & coverageIndividual case
- What you’ll find
- The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
- Coverage and limits
- The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.
Official source
Subject matter
- Civil service
- Accredited parliamentary assistants
- Article 24 of the Staff Regulations
- Request for assistance
- Article 12a of the Staff Regulations
- Psychological harassment
- Advisory Committee dealing with complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the European Parliament concerning harassment and its prevention at the workplace
- Decision rejecting the request for assistance
- Right to be heard
- Principle of audi alteram partem
- Refusal to disclose the opinion of the Advisory Committee and the minutes of the hearing of witnesses
- Refusal of the defendant institution to comply with a measure of inquiry of the General Court
Full official title
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 December 2018.#CN v European Parliament.#Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Advisory Committee dealing with complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the European Parliament concerning harassment and its prevention at the workplace — Decision rejecting the request for assistance — Right to be heard — Principle of audi alteram partem — Refusal to disclose the opinion of the Advisory Committee and the minutes of the hearing of witnesses — Refusal of the defendant institution to comply with a measure of inquiry of the General Court.#Case T-76/18.
- EUR-Lex document 62018TJ0076(opens in a new tab)Text not retrieved. Only the link and metadata are available.
AI summary
Not generatedGenerated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.
No summary has been generated for this case yet.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription
Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.
The prompt includes this record and its source links. Add the full judgment in your AI app before asking for analysis.