PD v European Investment Bank
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018
Open official document (opens in a new tab)About this page & coverageIndividual case
- What you’ll find
- The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
- Coverage and limits
- The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.
Official source
Subject matter
- Civil service
- Personnel of the EIB
- Psychological harassment
- Total and permanent disability
- Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease
- Action brought before the closure of the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease
- Inadmissibility
Full official title
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018.#PD v European Investment Bank.#Civil service — Personnel of the EIB — Psychological harassment — Total and permanent disability — Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Action brought before the closure of the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease — Inadmissibility.#Case T-615/16.
- EUR-Lex document 62016TJ0615(opens in a new tab)Text retrieved 11 October 2026
AI summary
Not generatedGenerated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.
No summary has been generated for this case yet.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription
Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.
The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.