Menu

T-275/17General Court of the European UnionJudgment of

Michela Curto v European Parliament

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 July 2018

Open official document (opens in a new tab)
About this page & coverageIndividual case
What you’ll find
The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
Coverage and limits
The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.

Official source

Subject matter

  • Civil service
  • Accredited parliamentary assistants
  • Article 24 of the Staff Regulations
  • Request for assistance
  • Article 12a of the Staff Regulations
  • Psychological harassment
  • Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the European Parliament and its prevention at the workplace
  • Decision rejecting the request for assistance
  • Error of assessment
  • Scope of the duty to provide assistance
  • Duration of the administrative procedure
  • Reasonable period
  • Refusal to disclose reports drawn up by the Advisory Committee
Full official title

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 July 2018.#Michela Curto v European Parliament.#Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints between Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Members of the European Parliament and its prevention at the workplace — Decision rejecting the request for assistance — Error of assessment — Scope of the duty to provide assistance — Duration of the administrative procedure — Reasonable period — Refusal to disclose reports drawn up by the Advisory Committee.#Case T-275/17.

AI summary

Not generated

Generated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.

No summary has been generated for this case yet.

Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription

Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.

The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.