Monica Semedo v European Parliament
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 March 2025
Open official document (opens in a new tab)About this page & coverageIndividual case
- What you’ll find
- The selected case’s official title, court metadata, matched topics and links to the publishing source, with retrieved-text status shown for each document.
- Coverage and limits
- The record reflects what the collection has imported. Generating an AI summary requires retrieved source text; any generated text is interpretation, not a court finding. The linked official document remains the authority.
Official source
Law governing the institutions – Member of Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days – Right to be heard – Rights of the defence.
Full official title
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 March 2025.#Monica Semedo v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days – Right to be heard – Rights of the defence.#Case T-349/23.
- EUR-Lex document 62023TJ0349(opens in a new tab)Text retrieved 12 October 2026
AI summary
Not generatedGenerated interpretation, not a court finding. Verify every point against the official source above.
No summary has been generated for this case yet.
Use your ChatGPT or Claude subscription
Copy a research prompt, then open your AI app and paste it into a new chat. You use your own account there; the answer stays in that app.
The prompt includes retrieved official source text and marks any known gaps.