Court rulings
Decisions of the Court of Justice and the General Court on harassment, discrimination and psychosocial risk at work.
About this page & coverageCourt records
- What you’ll find
- Court of Justice and General Court records relevant to harassment, discrimination, psychosocial risk and related staff-rights questions, with official metadata and source links.
- Coverage and limits
- The collection comes from keyword searches of the official source and may miss relevant rulings; the archive can include Civil Service Tribunal records. Results default to newest judgment date, with filters and other sort options available.
LU v European Investment Bank
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026
T-365/24General Court of the European Union
XH v European Commission
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026
C-75/24 PCourt of Justice of the European Union
BZ v European Central Bank
Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 October 2023
T-631/21General Court of the European Union
BZ v European Central Bank
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 October 2023
T-162/21General Court of the European Union
ZU v European Commission
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 October 2021
T-671/18General Court of the European Union
Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 May 2020
T-483/16General Court of the European Union
Karolina Romańska v European Border and Coast Guard Agency
Civil Service · Contract Staff · Contract for an indefinite period · Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS · Termination · Grounds for termination · Breakdown in the relationship of trust · Discrimination and psychological harassment · Compensation claim · Manifest inadmissibility
T-212/18General Court of the European Union
SQ v European Investment Bank
Civil Service · EIB staff · Complaint of psychological harassment · Administrative enquiry · Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ · Requirement that the conduct complained of must be repetitive in order to constitute ‘psychological harassment’ · Refusal to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the person responsible for that conduct · Duty of confidentiality in relation to an ongoing administrative enquiry and, subsequently, to the decision terminating the procedure finding that there had been psychological harassment
T-377/17General Court of the European Union