Court rulings
Decisions of the Court of Justice and the General Court on harassment, discrimination and psychosocial risk at work.
About this page & coverageCourt records
- What you’ll find
- Court of Justice and General Court records relevant to harassment, discrimination, psychosocial risk and related staff-rights questions, with official metadata and source links.
- Coverage and limits
- The collection comes from keyword searches of the official source and may miss relevant rulings; the archive can include Civil Service Tribunal records. Results default to newest judgment date, with filters and other sort options available.
LU v European Investment Bank
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026
T-365/24General Court of the European Union
HV and HW v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 December 2023
C-615/22 PCourt of Justice of the European Union
KN v European Parliament
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022
T-401/21General Court of the European Union
AI and Others v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 July 2022
T-864/19General Court of the European Union
ZU v European Commission
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 October 2021
T-671/18General Court of the European Union
BG v European Parliament
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 July 2021
T-253/19General Court of the European Union
European Union Satellite Centre v KF
Appeal · Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) · Member of SatCen’s contract staff · Complaints of psychological harassment · Administrative investigation · Request for assistance · Suspension of the staff member · Disciplinary proceedings · Removal of the staff member · SatCen’s Appeals Board · Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes · Action for annulment · First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU · Action for damages · Article 268 TFEU · Jurisdiction of the EU judicature · Admissibility · Acts open to challenge · Contractual nature of the dispute · Articles 272 and 274 TFEU · Effective judicial protection · Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU · First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU · Principle of equal treatment · General Court’s obligation to state reasons · Distortion of the facts and evidence · Rights of the defence · Principle of sound administration
C-14/19 PCourt of Justice of the European Union
SQ v European Investment Bank
Civil Service · EIB staff · Complaint of psychological harassment · Administrative enquiry · Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ · Requirement that the conduct complained of must be repetitive in order to constitute ‘psychological harassment’ · Refusal to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the person responsible for that conduct · Duty of confidentiality in relation to an ongoing administrative enquiry and, subsequently, to the decision terminating the procedure finding that there had been psychological harassment
T-377/17General Court of the European Union